**Title: Meghan & Harry: Cashing in on Royal Ties or Just Playing the Game?**

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are at it again, leveraging their royal lineage to expand their brand in a way that’s ruffling feathers and raising eyebrows. Recent discussions have emerged about their ongoing ventures, particularly Meghan’s collaboration with Netflix and her product line, which critics argue are blatant attempts to piggyback on their royal past.

In a revealing video discussion, experts weighed in on whether Meghan’s actions are driven primarily by her team or if Netflix plays a significant role in shaping her business trajectory. The consensus? Meghan is firmly at the helm, steering her brand into the spotlight, albeit with a chaotic flair that some find disconcerting. While most entrepreneurs toil away from the limelight, Meghan’s every move is scrutinized, leaving many to question the legitimacy of her business strategy.

As she continues to roll out products under her “With Love, Meghan” brand, the former actress is reportedly selling out items in a matter of minutes, captivating a wealthy American audience. However, the strategy feels less like a meticulously crafted plan and more like a reaction to the ever-changing public perception of her.

The stakes are high for the couple, with mounting costs and a desire for financial independence after stepping back from royal duties. Yet, the legacy of their royal connections hangs over their ventures, prompting frustration in some circles who feel they are coasting on past privileges.

In a recent podcast episode featuring Tina Knowles, Meghan adeptly navigated the complexities of familial ties and business, perhaps hinting at her own family dynamics. Critics argue that unless she secures A-list guests who genuinely believe in her brand rather than merely returning favors, her podcast risks losing authenticity.

As Meghan and Harry continue to carve out their niche, the question remains: are they innovating in the entertainment landscape, or merely recycling their royal past for commercial gain? Only time will tell if this strategy can sustain their ambitions without alienating the very public they once served.